Friday, March 24, 2006

Wikipedia study 'fatally flawed'

War of words (or a scholarly slanging match as the beeb puts it) between Encyclopaedia Britannica and the Magazine Nature on whether Wikipedia and the afformentioned Britannica were accurate in their information. It seem Encyclopaedia Britannica aren't happy that 'they are about as acurate as one another'. Hmmmm, one is free, the other isn't, can't imagine why they're unhappy.


BBC NEWS | Technology | Wikipedia study 'fatally flawed'
A study on the accuracy of the free online resource, Wikipedia, by the prestigious journal Nature has been described as 'fatally flawed'.

No comments: